FutureTroglodyte/udacity-nd027-postgres
Udacity Data Engeneering Nanodegree Program - My submission of Project: Data Modeling with Postgres
Udacity Data Engeneering Nanodegree Program
My submission of Project Data Modeling with Postgres
Summary
The goal of this project is to define fact and dimension tables for a star schema for a particular analytic focus, and write an ETL pipeline that transfers data from files in two local directories into five tables in Postgres using Python and SQL.
Raw Data
The raw date is in the data/folder and contains
- *song_data*.jsons ('artist_id', 'artist_latitude', 'artist_location',
'artist_longitude', 'artist_name', 'duration', 'num_songs',
'song_id', 'title', 'year') - a subset of real data from the Million Song Dataset. - *log_data*.jsons ('artist', 'auth', 'firstName', 'gender', 'itemInSession',
'lastName', 'length', 'level', 'location', 'method', 'page',
'registration', 'sessionId', 'song', 'status', 'ts', 'userAgent',
'userId') - simulated activity logs from a music streaming app based on specified configurations.
Create sparkifydb Postgres Database - Define Fact and Dimension Tables for a Star Schema
Run python3 create_tables.py in a terminal to create the Postgres DB containing:
A Fact Table
- songplays (songplay_id, start_time, user_id, level, song_id, artist_id, session_id, location, user_agent) - records in log data associated with song plays
Four Dimension Tables
- users (user_id, first_name, last_name, gender, level) - users in the app
- songs (song_id, title, artist_id, year, duration) - songs in music database
- artists (artist_id, name, location, latitude, longitude) - artists in music database
- time (start_time, hour, day, week, month, year, weekday) - timestamps of records in songplays broken down into specific units
Run ETL Pipeline
Fill the five star schema tables with data from the raw data jsons by running python3 etl.py in a terminal.
Discuss the Purpose of this Database in the Context of the Startup, Sparkify, and their Analytical Goals.
The startup Sparkify is an audio streaming services provider. "As a freemium service, basic features are free with advertisements and limited control, while additional features, such as offline listening and commercial-free listening, are offered via paid subscriptions. Users can search for music based on artist, album, or genre, and can create, edit, and share playlists." (Taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotify)
So the commercial goal is to get as many users as long as possible to use sparkify. In order to achieve this, sparkify must meet/exceed the users expectations and satisfy them. Ways of doing this are
- providing a huge database of artists and songs
- a fancy and usable (Browser, Mobile-App, Desktop-App) GUI
- a good search engine (Analytical goal!)
- a good recommendation system (Analytical goal!)
This database serves the needs of a good recommendation system: The favourite songs of user X can easily be extracted of our fact_table given their number_of_plays (by X). So we can put users in clusters based on their favourite songs. And if X likes the songs a, b, & c and there are other Users in (one of) his cluster(-s) which likes the songs a, b, c, & d he also might like song d. Let's recommend this song to him. He supposably enjoys that and thus enjoys sparkify.
State and Justify your Database Schema Design and ETL pipeline.
Database Schema Design
The denormalized fact table songplays provides most information sparkify needs for its basic analytical goals. Reading and aggregation is very fast and if we need additional information from the dimension tables
usersartistssongs(missing genre here 'tho)time
the joins are very simple -> high readability.
Create Database and Tables
As all SQL queries are stored in the sql_queries.py file, the create_tables.py is very compact and readable. It simply contains of four steps:
- Drop the Postgres DB
sparkifydb - Create the Postgres DB
sparkifydb - Drop all star schema tables
- Create all star schema tables
ETL pipeline
As all SQL queries are stored in the sql_queries.py file, the etl.py is very compact and readable. It can be divided in steps:
- Read *song_data*.jsons as pd.DataFrame
- Insert data into
songstable - Insert data into
artiststable - Read *log_data*.jsons as pd.DataFrame, filtered by "page" == "NextSong"
- Insert data into
timetable - Insert data into
userstable - Get
song_idandartist_idfromsongandartisttables given a songstitle,artist_nameandlength. It does not work on this small subset as mentioned below. - Insert data into
songplaystable
[Optional] Provide Example Queries and Results for Song Play Analysis.
"Since this is a subset of the much larger dataset, the solution dataset will only have 1 row with values for [...] songid and artistid in the fact table.", as mentioned project's rubric. A query which orders the songs by their number of plays (which can be seeen as their populartity) like the very simple one here
SELECT
sp.song_id,
s.title,
COUNT(sp.songplay_id) AS num_of_plays
FROM songplays AS sp
INNER JOIN songs AS s
ON sü.song_id = s.song_id
GROUP BY
sp.song_id,
s.title
ORDER BY COUNT(sp.songplay_id)
does not work.
To be more precise, queries regarding either songs or artists unfortunately do not provide any results for song play analysis on this database.
All we can do is some user analysis over time like:
SELECT
sp.user_id,
u.last_name,
u.first_name,
t.year,
t.month,
t.day,
-- t.hour,
210 * COUNT(sp.songplay_id) AS time_spent,
FROM songplays AS sp
INNER JOIN users AS U
ON sp.user_id = u.user_id
INNER JOIN time AS t
ON sp.start_time = t.start_time
GROUP BY
sp.user_id,
u.last_name,
u.first_name,
t.year,
t.month,
t.day
-- , t.hour
ORDER BY
sp.user_id,
u.last_name,
u.first_name,
t.year,
t.month,
t.day
-- , t.hour
Under the assumtions that
- an average song has a length of 210 sec
- the useer does not skip/stop any songs,
it gives the time (in sec) users are spending on sparkify for each day (resp. each hour).